Table of ContentsClick to view all sections
- Punjab Haryana High Court Result 2026: At a Glance
- Final Selection and Pending PwD Posts
- How to Check Your Result
- Interview Marks and Testimonials Checking
- Vacancy Breakdown
- Eligibility Criteria in the Original Notice
- Selection Process: How Candidates Were Assessed
- Important Dates
- Application Fees and Documents
- How the Application Process Worked
- Common Result-Checking Mistakes to Avoid
- Final Takeaway
- Official Quick Links
The Punjab Haryana High Court Result for Safai Sewak and Mali was declared on 18 October 2026. The High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh, selected 164 candidates against 167 advertised posts: 74 for Safai Sewak and 90 for Mali. Three PwD-category posts remain pending, and the result notices state that their outcome will be announced in due course. Candidates should use the official recruitment page to locate the separate result PDFs and check for any subsequent notice.
This article summarises the published selection figures for the Punjab Haryana High Court Result, explains how to check it, and distinguishes the final selection lists from interview marks and testimonials-checking records. It also preserves key details from Employment Notice No. 03/SS/ML/HC/2026 for applicants who want to review the original vacancies, eligibility conditions, selection process, dates and fees. Applications are closed, and the recruitment information below is provided for reference.
Punjab Haryana High Court Result 2026: At a Glance
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Recruiting authority | High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh |
| Employment notice | No. 03/SS/ML/HC/2026 |
| Posts | Safai Sewak and Mali |
| Total advertised vacancies | 167: 75 Safai Sewak and 92 Mali |
| Final result date | 18 October 2026 |
| Selected candidates | 164: 74 Safai Sewak and 90 Mali |
| Posts awaiting result | 3, all in PwD categories |
| Selection basis | Interview, followed by testimonials and eligibility-document checking |
The result is not a single combined list for both posts. The High Court published separate result documents for Safai Sewak and Mali, so candidates need to open the PDF that corresponds to the post for which they applied. The published totals show that most vacancies have been filled, but they do not mean every advertised post has a selected candidate at this stage.
Final Selection and Pending PwD Posts
The result PDFs list selected roll numbers by post and category. The figures below reflect the published selection summary. The High Court’s notices state that the remaining posts will be declared in due course; they do not provide a date for that further result. Candidates should therefore use the official recruitment page for subsequent information rather than assume a release date.
| Category / result status | Safai Sewak | Mali |
|---|---|---|
| General | 60 selected | 74 selected |
| SC/ST/BC | 8 selected | 9 selected |
| Ex-Servicemen | 4 selected | 5 selected |
| PwD – Low Vision | 1 selected | 1 selected |
| PwD – Deaf and Dumb | 1 selected | 1 selected |
| PwD – Intellectually Disabled / Challenged (Mild IQ) | 1 post pending | 1 post pending |
| PwD post on merit from combined list of three PwD categories | Not applicable | 1 post pending |
| Total | 74 selected out of 75 | 90 selected out of 92 |
In total, one Safai Sewak post and two Mali posts are awaiting the remaining PwD-category result. The published selection lists do not include the Mild IQ category candidates in the final selection. The pending entries should not be read as a separate selection or as confirmation that a particular candidate has been appointed. They indicate only that these posts have not yet been resolved in the published result summary.
For a candidate checking a particular category, the category table offers context but does not replace the official PDF. Confirm the roll number and any remarks in the relevant post’s final selection list. If a name or roll number appears in a different document, such as the interview marks sheet, that alone is not proof of final selection.
How to Check Your Result
To check the Punjab Haryana High Court Result, start from the High Court’s recruitment page and locate the notice number rather than relying on a search-engine preview or an unofficial repost. The page is the appropriate place to find the official result files and any later notice about the three pending posts. Use these steps:
- Open the High Court’s official recruitment page using the link in the quick-links section below.
- Look for Employment Notice No. 03/SS/ML/HC/2026 and the Safai Sewak or Mali final result notice.
- Open the PDF for the post you applied for. Safai Sewak and Mali have separate result files.
- Use the PDF search function to look for your roll number in the relevant category list.
- Read any remarks and check the annexure, if provided. The result documents include marks information for candidates called for testimonials checking.
- Save a copy of the relevant result document for your records and revisit the official page for instructions about document verification or the pending posts.
When checking a PDF, make sure it is the final selection list for the correct post. A roll number in an interview marks document, an attendance-related entry or a testimonials-checking annexure may describe a different stage of the process. Read the document heading and the applicable remarks before drawing a conclusion. If the PDF includes category-wise lists, compare your details with the appropriate category rather than relying on the overall vacancy total.
The result notice is the source for the published selection status. The information available here does not include direct PDF URLs, so use the recruitment page to identify the current files. If a later notice is issued for the pending posts, check its date and wording on that official page.
Interview Marks and Testimonials Checking
Selection was based on an interview, not a written examination. The interview carried 50 marks in total: 25 for suitability for the job and 25 for etiquette or manners. Separate roll-wise marks documents were issued for the two posts. The figures below describe the interview and testimonials-checking information supplied for this recruitment.
| Post | Interview marks | Candidates listed for interview | Testimonials checking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safai Sewak | 50: 25 for suitability and 25 for etiquette / manners | 7,083 | 176 candidates; held 28–30 September 2026 |
| Mali | 50: 25 for suitability and 25 for etiquette / manners | 9,050 | 210 candidates; held 28–30 September 2026 |
The number listed for interview is not the number ultimately selected. Similarly, the candidates whose testimonials were checked form a separate group from the final selection total. The recruitment process included an interview and then checking of testimonials and eligibility documents, so each document relates to a particular stage.
The interview marks documents may show candidates marked absent. Testimonials-checking annexures may also record absence or rejection of candidature. Read the relevant marks entry and remarks carefully; an interview score is not, by itself, confirmation of final selection. For final status, verify the roll number in the result list for the relevant post.
Vacancy Breakdown
The original notice advertised 167 vacancies: 75 Safai Sewak posts and 92 Mali posts. The category-wise vacancy information is reproduced below for applicants comparing the result summary with the original recruitment totals.
| Post | General | SC/ST/BC | Ex-Servicemen | PwD | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safai Sewak | 60 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 75 |
| Mali | 74 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 92 |
| Total | 134 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 167 |
The total of seven PwD vacancies is consistent with the three Safai Sewak and four Mali PwD posts shown in the vacancy table. The final selection summary records one Safai Sewak and two Mali posts as pending. This is why the 164 selections in the published result are fewer than the 167 posts originally advertised.
Eligibility Criteria in the Original Notice
Educational qualification and preference
The essential qualification stated for the posts was knowledge of Hindi and the regional language; a degree or diploma was not required. The notice also provided preference for relevant prior training or experience. These were preference provisions and should not be confused with a separate degree requirement:
- Mali: a gardening-related diploma from a recognised institute and/or three years’ experience as a gardener.
- Safai Sewak: three years’ experience as a Safai Sewak (sweeper).
The relevant diploma or experience had to be held by the application closing date, 30 June 2026, to claim preference. Applicants who claimed such a preference were still required to produce supporting proof when asked. A preference claim did not remove the requirement to meet the stated eligibility conditions or to have documents checked.
Age limit
Applicants had to be between 18 and 35 years old as of 30 June 2026. The stated upper-age relaxation was 10 years for PwD candidates. For Ex-Servicemen, relaxation was equal to the period of defence service plus three years, subject to the conditions in the notice. Candidates reviewing their original eligibility should use the notice and the relevant supporting documents rather than calculate eligibility from a different reference date.
Salary and work conditions
The notice did not specify a fixed salary amount or pay level. Pay and allowances were to be governed by the latest Government of Punjab rules adopted by the High Court for its employees. As a result, a specific monthly amount should not be inferred from the vacancy or result information alone. The notice also stated that duty hours could extend beyond normal working hours, including to odd hours.
Selection Process: How Candidates Were Assessed
The stated selection process comprised an interview followed by checking of testimonials and eligibility documents. There was no written examination. The interview was scored out of 50, split equally between suitability for the job and etiquette or manners. The High Court could use suitable shortlisting criteria if needed.
Eligibility remained provisional until the supporting documents had been checked. This is relevant when reading the marks and annexure documents: an interview result is one part of the process, while document checking addresses the claims made in an application. Candidates claiming a category, age relaxation, Ex-Servicemen status or preference needed to support the applicable claim with the required proof.
Because the result records and interview marks sheets serve different purposes, candidates should not treat them as interchangeable. The final result list establishes the published selection outcome for each post; marks and testimonials documents provide information about earlier or related stages. The recruitment information supplied does not state that a written test was held or that interview marks alone automatically determined appointment.
Important Dates
| Event | Date / status |
|---|---|
| Online applications opened | 9 June 2026 |
| Application deadline | 30 June 2026 |
| Testimonials checking | 28–30 September 2026 |
| Final result declared | 18 October 2026; 164 of 167 posts filled |
| Remaining PwD-category posts | Pending; check the official recruitment page for updates |
The application window has closed. The dates are included to help applicants understand the timeline of this recruitment and do not indicate that applications are currently being accepted. No date for the remaining PwD-category result is provided in the available result information.
Application Fees and Documents
| Applicant category | Fee |
|---|---|
| General and SC/ST/BC candidates from other States/UTs | ₹700 |
| SC/ST/BC candidates from Punjab, Haryana and UT Chandigarh | ₹600 |
| Ex-Servicemen | ₹600 |
| Persons with Disability | ₹600 |
The fee was non-refundable, with online transaction charges payable separately. Dependents of Ex-Servicemen disabled or deceased during active operation were exempt, subject to uploading proof. Applications are closed; these charges are included as a record of the original notice, not as a request for payment.
Applicants were asked to keep relevant supporting documents available for the application and testimonials checking. The listed examples included:
- Proof of date of birth, such as a Matriculation certificate or birth certificate.
- An applicable caste or category certificate for SC/ST/BC claims.
- A disability certificate for PwD claims; the notice specified disability of not less than 40%.
- An Ex-Servicemen discharge book or other relevant proof, where applicable.
- A gardening diploma or experience certificate, or Safai Sewak experience proof, if claiming preference.
- A recent photograph and signature as required for the online form.
This list reflects the documents identified for the recruitment. The applicable document depended on the claim made by the applicant. Candidates called for testimonials checking were expected to have supporting records available; the published information does not establish a new document-submission schedule for all selected candidates.
How the Application Process Worked
The online application window closed on 30 June 2026. The steps below are retained as an explanation of the original process only; they are not an invitation to apply now.
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| 1 | Register using an active email address and mobile number. |
| 2 | Enter personal, category and qualification details as shown on supporting certificates. |
| 3 | Upload the required photograph and signature. |
| 4 | Pay the applicable fee through the available online payment method. |
| 5 | Submit the form and save or print a copy for records. |
| 6 | Submit a separate application for each post if applying for both. |
These archived steps help explain why applicants were asked to retain application records and proofs. They do not change the current status: the application deadline passed, and the final result has been issued for most posts.
Common Result-Checking Mistakes to Avoid
- Opening the wrong PDF: Check the final selection list for your post, not only the interview marks document.
- Ignoring the post name: Safai Sewak and Mali results are separate, so verify that the PDF matches your application.
- Checking a roll number without context: Confirm the category and read any remarks or annexure references.
- Assuming all vacancies are filled: Three PwD-category posts remain pending in the published summary.
- Confusing process stages: Interview candidates, candidates called for testimonials checking and finally selected candidates are different groups.
- Relying on an unofficial repost: Use the High Court recruitment page to confirm the official result file and later notices.
- Expecting an unannounced date: The notices say the pending posts will be declared in due course, but the information here does not give a specific date.
Final Takeaway
The Punjab Haryana High Court Result confirms 164 selections—74 Safai Sewak and 90 Mali—out of 167 advertised posts. Candidates should verify their roll number in the correct final result PDF, read any remarks, and retain relevant original documents if further verification is directed. Three PwD-category posts remain unresolved: one Safai Sewak post and two Mali posts. Check the official recruitment page for a subsequent notice instead of assuming a date or relying on an unofficial update.
Frequently Asked Questions
When was the Safai Sewak and Mali final result declared?
The High Court declared the final result on 18 October 2026.
How many candidates were selected?
A total of 164 candidates were selected: 74 for Safai Sewak and 90 for Mali.
Are all 167 vacancies filled?
No. Three PwD-category posts remain pending: one Safai Sewak post and two Mali posts. The result notices state that these will be declared in due course.
Where can I check the Punjab Haryana High Court Result?
Visit the official High Court recruitment page and locate Employment Notice No. 03/SS/ML/HC/2026. The Safai Sewak and Mali selection lists are separate PDFs.
Was there a written exam for these posts?
No written examination was part of the stated selection process. Candidates were assessed through an interview, followed by testimonials checking.
How were interview marks calculated?
The interview was marked out of 50: 25 marks for suitability for the job and 25 for etiquette or manners.
How many candidates were listed for interview?
The supplied figures list 7,083 candidates for the Safai Sewak interview and 9,050 for the Mali interview. These figures are not the final selection totals.
What was the age limit in the original recruitment?
The age range was 18 to 35 years as of 30 June 2026, with the relaxations stated in the recruitment notice for eligible PwD candidates and Ex-Servicemen.
Can I still apply for the Safai Sewak or Mali posts?
No. The application period ended on 30 June 2026, and the final result has been declared for most posts.
Official Quick Links
| Resource | Link |
|---|---|
| Recruitment notices and result updates | Punjab and Haryana High Court recruitment page |
| High Court official website | highcourtchd.gov.in |
Use the recruitment page to locate the official Safai Sewak and Mali result PDFs. No direct PDF URL is listed here; confirm the latest files and any pending-post notices on the High Court website.
Comments (1)